Constitutional Scholars Make Impeachment Case


0
Constitutional Scholars Make Impeachment Case

Who is this Jonathan Turley? Cenk Uygur and Ana Kasparian, hosts of The Young Turks, break it down. Tell us what you think in the comments below.

MORE TYT: https://tyt.com/trial

Read more here:
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/04/us/politics/jonathan-turley.html

“Jonathan Turley is a well-known legal expert, often seen on cable news talking about a range of issues including tort law, espionage, constitutional law and, most recently, impeachment. He is a professor at George Washington University Law School and has represented clients from a variety of backgrounds and political affiliations.”

Hosts: Cenk Uygur, Ana Kasparian

Cast: Cenk Uygur, Ana Kasparian

***

The Largest Online News Show in the World. Hosted by Cenk Uygur and Ana Kasparian. LIVE STREAMING weekdays 6-8pm ET. http://tyt.com/live

Subscribe to The Young Turks on YouTube: http://youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=theyoungturks

TYT on Facebook: http://facebook.com/theyoungturks
TYT on Twitter: http://twitter.com/theyoungturks
TYT on Instagram: http://instagram.com/theyoungturks

Merch: http://www.shoptyt.com

Donate to TYT
https://patreon.com/tytnetwork
http://tyt.com/donate

Download audio and video of the full two-hour show on-demand + the members-only postgame show by becoming a member at http://tyt.com/join/. Your membership supports the day to day operations and is vital for our continued success and growth.

Gift membership: http://tyt.com/gift

Producer, Senior Producer and Executive Producer membership: http://go.tyt.com/producer

Young Turk (n), 1. Young progressive or insurgent member of an institution, movement, or political party. 2. A young person who rebels against authority or societal expectations. (American Heritage Dictionary)

#TYT #TheYoungTurks #Trump

source


Like it? Share with your friends!

0

What's Your Reaction?

hate hate
0
hate
confused confused
0
confused
fail fail
0
fail
fun fun
0
fun
geeky geeky
0
geeky
love love
0
love
lol lol
0
lol
omg omg
0
omg
win win
0
win

37 Comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. WHY IN THE HELL REPUBLICANS ARE MAD BECAUSE DEMOCRATS ARE GOING BY THE RULES JOHN BOEHNER AND HIS REPUBLICAN MAJORITY WROTE IN 2015 LMAO. REPUBLICANS CAN BITCH AND WHINE ALL THEY WANT NOBODY CARES. THEY SHOULD'VE KEPT THERE MAJORITY IN 2018

  2. Turley's best defence of Trump is "impeachment is going too fast". Pathetic. Notice no defence of Trump's actions and behaviour. Turley's flip-flop on executive power expansion and abuse is astoundingly hypocritical.

  3. Isnt turly the guy that same you must impeach bill Clinton over lying about an affair. It to the credit was him lying so if was an impeachable offence.but his argument was I would user in anarchy, if we didn't impeach bill. Hhmmm odddd

  4. With today’s technology in communications, impeachment should take faster than it did in the times of Tricky Dick Nixon. It’s not about how long the process takes. It’s about thoroughness. Turley is not building any real arguments in his defense of trump’s impeachment process. The process has been swift because there is SO much crime. How much more evidence do they need?

  5. Ana: "The Dems called on three Constitutional experts, the Republicans called on one"
    No you globalist mutt, the Republicans were only allowed one. TYT = fake news.

  6. So here's the time-line, folks: Congress will vote and Trump will be impeached. Then it goes to the Senate where a trial will occur and the Republican majority will rightly find Trump innocent of any wrong-doing. But in that trial many key Democrats involved in the Ukrainian corruption scandal will be called upon to testify under oath. Very good Mr. President. the TRAP has been set.

  7. Jonathan Turley though was also suggesting that further evidence could be made available – possibly inferring that if the president really wanted he had the option of clearing himself by not resisting the served subpoenas and not standing in the way of his Administration. The Republican questioning, biased as it was, probably showed him more slanted towards the Republicans than he really is. It has to have you wondering if the Republicans, at least collectively, might just be capable of throwing in the towel. Some may be hoping the Democrats can make the case – they may even have a common cause – the president, while having given them short term success, on the basis that Rudi is a hand grenade, will inevitably prove to be a massive munitions dump of IEDs – who can possibly know what's still to come. There's political capital to be made by Republicans getting what most of them would like to have by letting Democrats do it for them and being able to criticise them for it – played correctly, and without losing the Trump base.

  8. So Turley wants more investigation into this administration ?? Gee. If only someone had done that already. If only they had written a report on it. If only they had intended that report to be a guide for impeaching this Orange prick. If only more than 5% of the population had actually read that report !!!

  9. 3:19 She's either stupid or a liar. Turley was clear that he believed the evidence was insufficient to impeach. He says there is "a paucity of evidence and an abundance of anger". Definition of paucity….."the presence of something only in small or insufficient quantities or amounts"    Synonyms: Dearth, lack-of, shortage

    And people actually listen to her to be informed. Wow.

  10. The only thing I agreed with Turley on was the fact that this impeachment is being rushed. They have not got a case where the public would watch or the Republican Senators at the hearing watching would have to say "He did it, He has to go." There is a very strong case to be made against Trump but the Demoicrats do not appear to be interested in presenting their best case.

    You cannot compare Trump and Clinton: If you want to look at Impeachment and compare cases you have to remember that Trump's crimes are worse than Nixon. Also with Clinton they had to drop the articles related to Whitewater before they sent it over to the Senate. Now they have said that Clinton was about a sexual assualt, which is something that until now I had never heard. The final articles of Impeachment were about a blow job and nothing else.

  11. You both are disgusting reporters from your Russia gate crap to your smearing of Gabbard now because you hate Trump so much you start to go after the only sound expert on impeachment. You both are claiming his only argument is his claim it is moving to fast , that is not his whole argument what a bunch of crap you try to spread.

  12. Well at least you guys were not total pieces of shit. But there should be absolutely no accusation of bias on turley.

    Did you miss the segment of that gaetz guy where he points out all of the pre-conceived opinions on everyone and then contrasts that with no bias of John turley.

Choose A Format
Personality quiz
Series of questions that intends to reveal something about the personality
Trivia quiz
Series of questions with right and wrong answers that intends to check knowledge
Poll
Voting to make decisions or determine opinions
Story
Formatted Text with Embeds and Visuals
List
The Classic Internet Listicles
Countdown
The Classic Internet Countdowns
Open List
Submit your own item and vote up for the best submission
Ranked List
Upvote or downvote to decide the best list item
Meme
Upload your own images to make custom memes
Video
Youtube, Vimeo or Vine Embeds
Audio
Soundcloud or Mixcloud Embeds
Image
Photo or GIF
Gif
GIF format